WARNING: THIS SITE IS A MIRROR OF GITHUB.COM / IT CANNOT LOGIN OR REGISTER ACCOUNTS / THE CONTENTS ARE PROVIDED AS-IS / THIS SITE ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DISPLAYED CONTENT OR LINKS / IF YOU FOUND SOMETHING MAY NOT GOOD FOR EVERYONE, CONTACT ADMIN AT ilovescratch@foxmail.com
Skip to content

Conversation

@chengyumeng
Copy link

What I mainly do in the PR:

In the card selection policy, on the premise of ensuring that the selected card group has the highest score, try to make the remaining cards have higher scores.

for example In the following topology, if cards 0-5 are within the candidate range and two cards are selected at this time, card 4-5 should be selected instead of 0-1 or 2-3, because this can ensure the remaining 0-3 The mutual communication between cards is optimal and is conducive to the subsequent allocation of 4-card services.

image

This PR does not introduce additional complexity. It further calculates the scores of the remaining cards based on the original scoring logic to assist in decision-making.

@klueska
Copy link
Contributor

klueska commented Aug 17, 2025

Sorry for the delay on this. Can you rename "left" to "remaining" throughout.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants