It seems impossible to pin the threads

[rongcuid]

I have tried many methods to pin OpenBLAS threads (for microbenchmark purpose), but none of the implied methods work. I have tried every combination of:

• NO_AFFINITY=1 or NO_AFFINITY=0
• OPENBLAS_NUM_THREADS
• GOTOBLAS_MAIN_FREE, OPENBLAS_MAIN_FREE
• openblas_set_num_threads before any call, right before set affinity, and after set affinity.
• openblas_setaffinity with cpuset_t that are known to be correct on other microbenchmarks.
• Whether I pin the main thread or not.

No matter what I do, OpenBLAS uses more threads than I allow it, except in the one case of setting OPENBLAS_NUM_THREADS. It seems like it just automatically increases the amount of threads to use all hyperthreads on the physical cores, sometimes more.

How exactly does the OpenBlas thread affinity work? Am I supposed to set NO_AFFINITY to 1 or 0? Does openblas_set_num_threads have any effects in run time?

Here's my config:

OpenBLAS 0.3.30 NO_AFFINITY HASWELL MAX_THREADS=28

This is how I pin the threads (using hwloc):

    for (int i = 0; i < threads; ++i) {
      int core = i;
      int ht = pin_offset;
      hwloc_obj_t core_obj = hwloc_get_obj_by_type(topo, HWLOC_OBJ_CORE, core);
      if (!core_obj) {
        fprintf(stderr, "Failed to get core\n");
        exit(1);
      }
      hwloc_obj_t ht_obj = hwloc_get_obj_below_by_type(topo, HWLOC_OBJ_CORE,
                                                       core, HWLOC_OBJ_PU, ht);
      if (!ht_obj) {
        fprintf(stderr, "Failed to get thread\n");
        exit(1);
      }
      fprintf(stderr, "Logical core [%d:%d] is physical [%d:%d]\n", core, ht,
              core_obj->os_index, ht_obj->os_index);
      cpu_set_t cpu_set;
      CPU_ZERO(&cpu_set);
      hwloc_cpuset_to_glibc_sched_affinity(topo, ht_obj->cpuset, &cpu_set,
                                           sizeof(cpu_set));
      if (openblas_setaffinity(i, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpu_set)) {
        perror("openblas_setaffinity()");
        exit(1);
      }
    }

Is this a bug? A misuse? I have no idea.