compare BinaryNinja with ida and Ghidra

[bb33bb]

i tried many times of them.
As everybody on the earth knows, ida pro leaked.
But arm plugin not.
I think the current advantage of ninja is truely some what on somewhat mobile cpu aspect.
may be arm/mips.
When using them on Chrome, maybe some months before, only ida pro can did finish the reverse job.
Now ninja and Ghidra can also.
But when analysis arm64 vmlinux, now only ninja can.
Even Ghidra can also, but the rough c language from Ghidra is not satisfied for me.
Also there are still some future work for ninja, for example of "not implented instructions" etc.
any how , maybe mobile is a future work for every analysis tools.

[plafosse]

I'm sorry the translation here is making it very difficult for me to understand what question you're asking. Any chance you can rephrase your question?

[psifertex]

Unfortunately there are just too many things that we could possible compare features, architectures, decompilation, control flow recovery, etc, between all decompiler products. I'd recommend you use something like dogbolt to better see output differences.

Sorry we don't have a better answer right now!