WARNING: THIS SITE IS A MIRROR OF GITHUB.COM / IT CANNOT LOGIN OR REGISTER ACCOUNTS / THE CONTENTS ARE PROVIDED AS-IS / THIS SITE ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DISPLAYED CONTENT OR LINKS / IF YOU FOUND SOMETHING MAY NOT GOOD FOR EVERYONE, CONTACT ADMIN AT ilovescratch@foxmail.com
Skip to content

Conversation

@claymcleod
Copy link
Collaborator

@claymcleod claymcleod commented Nov 2, 2025

This PR clarifies the behavior of multi-level optionals in the "Optional Types" section as outlined in #725.

Closes #725.

Before submitting this PR, please make sure:

  • You have added a few sentences describing the PR here.
  • You have added yourself or the appropriate individual as the assignee.
  • You have updated the README.md or other documentation to account for these
    changes (when appropriate).
  • You have updated the CHANGELOG.md describing the change and linking back to your pull request.
  • You have read and agree to the CONTRIBUTING.md document.
  • You have added or updated relevant example WDL tests to the specification.
    • See the guide for more details.

@claymcleod claymcleod requested a review from a team November 2, 2025 20:47
@claymcleod claymcleod self-assigned this Nov 2, 2025
@claymcleod claymcleod changed the base branch from wdl-1.2 to wdl-1.2.1 November 2, 2025 20:48
@claymcleod claymcleod added Z-specification-change (Metadata) An issue or PR related to a specification change. K-clarification (Kind) Clarifications regarding the WDL specification. S05-in-progress (State) A task that is in progress. labels Nov 2, 2025
@claymcleod claymcleod added this to the 1.2.1 milestone Nov 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

K-clarification (Kind) Clarifications regarding the WDL specification. S05-in-progress (State) A task that is in progress. Z-specification-change (Metadata) An issue or PR related to a specification change.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

State more clearly the restriction on multi-level optionals

1 participant