In the following minimal example in latest nightly (using a struct<T> DiagnosticResult { ... }), the "implement missing members" intention shadows the type parameter T.


This creates rather confusing error messages if you didn't actually read the code that it inserted!

The two type parameters T and T are different, but I imagine that in a more complex scenario than this, it could hide the source of bugs. I think rust-analyzer should probably output code similar to