WARNING: THIS SITE IS A MIRROR OF GITHUB.COM / IT CANNOT LOGIN OR REGISTER ACCOUNTS / THE CONTENTS ARE PROVIDED AS-IS / THIS SITE ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DISPLAYED CONTENT OR LINKS / IF YOU FOUND SOMETHING MAY NOT GOOD FOR EVERYONE, CONTACT ADMIN AT ilovescratch@foxmail.com
Skip to content

Conversation

@PhilipPartsch
Copy link
Contributor

try to implement #1452

@PhilipPartsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ubmarco, @danwos , @chrisjsewell : Could I get a review?

Copy link
Member

@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heya, I would need to see a good use case of why this is required cheers

@PhilipPartsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

PhilipPartsch commented Nov 9, 2025

The Idea is to have the same filter algorithm as for needtable, needlist, ...

@PhilipPartsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

Even the documentation specifies, we can use needs within filter string in calc_sum: https://sphinx-needs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/filter.html#filter-string

So the missing needs are a bug.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants