WARNING: THIS SITE IS A MIRROR OF GITHUB.COM / IT CANNOT LOGIN OR REGISTER ACCOUNTS / THE CONTENTS ARE PROVIDED AS-IS / THIS SITE ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DISPLAYED CONTENT OR LINKS / IF YOU FOUND SOMETHING MAY NOT GOOD FOR EVERYONE, CONTACT ADMIN AT ilovescratch@foxmail.com
Skip to content

Conversation

@Sgtpluck
Copy link
Contributor

@Sgtpluck Sgtpluck commented Nov 4, 2025

DO NOT MERGE YET

🎫 Ticket

Link to the relevant ticket:
LG-XXXXX
-->

🛠 Summary of changes

PR to remove vectors of trust when our final partner migrates to acr_values

Note:
The EIPP implementation relies on vectors of trust. This does not seem to be the right approach, as when I talked to them about it months ago, it sounded like EIPP was not evaluated on a per-request level. However, it was never updated for a new implementation, and then development was cancelled.

I don't want to make any decisions regarding EIPP, and it sounds like it might be a feature that comes back. Therefore, I mostly just marked the related specs as pending so that the team can make decisions about how to update it when the time comes.

TODO:
rename files to remove Vot from namespacing

@Sgtpluck Sgtpluck requested a review from a team November 5, 2025 13:17
Copy link
Contributor

@vrajmohan vrajmohan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a Herculean task that is hard to review. Have you considered an approach that has more steps that can be progressively deployed?

@Sgtpluck
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sgtpluck commented Nov 6, 2025

@vrajmohan i have thought about it, but it's embedded in a lot of code, making it pretty tough to remove piecemeal. i also worry, based on shifting priorities and such, that leaving it to be piecemeal means that some parts of it are never removed or get forgotten about

happy to take suggestions about how you might approach it in a step-by-step fashion, though, if you have any! i won't have time before i go on vacation, but could reconsider when i get back

@Sgtpluck Sgtpluck mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants