Updated license URL as suggested by Software::License. #62
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
Updating the URLs is fine but changing the names used to refer to the license is probably a breaking change. |
Author
|
@Grinnz , I see your point but do you have any idea when did the change happen i.e. gpl3 to gpl_3? |
manwar
force-pushed
the
tidy-up-license-meta-name
branch
from
cb07b7f to
1410455
Compare
manwar
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi Team,
Please review the PR.
It proposes the license URL for GPLv2 and GPLv3 as suggested by Software::License.
Many Thanks.
Best Regards,
Mohammad S Anwar