print: bypass the multiline mode of pretty_string_literal for merely trailing \n.
#27
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
At some point I added a multiline pretty string format using Rust-compatible string continuations, i.e.
\at the end of a line ignores all whitespace following it, so these are equivalent Rust literals:"foo\n"(the last one is never used by
spirt::pretty, because it cannot be indented without changing the meaning of the string literal, andspirt::print::prettyassumes everything can be indented)This PR ignores trailing
\nwhen determining whether the multiline format should be used, i.e. only\nin the middle of a string will use\continuations (with the\nmoved to the start of following lines).Quick example (the very one that made me think it'd be worth a minor aesthetic improvement):