-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
Test migration #759
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Test migration #759
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #759 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 92.47% 92.45% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 139 139
Lines 5618 5618
Branches 918 918
==========================================
- Hits 5195 5194 -1
Misses 272 272
- Partials 151 152 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
babenek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is a good cause to extract train() from main like in
https://github.com/Samsung/CredSweeper/pull/748/files
Description
Implementing migration from keras to pytorch
How has this been tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes.