WARNING: THIS SITE IS A MIRROR OF GITHUB.COM / IT CANNOT LOGIN OR REGISTER ACCOUNTS / THE CONTENTS ARE PROVIDED AS-IS / THIS SITE ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DISPLAYED CONTENT OR LINKS / IF YOU FOUND SOMETHING MAY NOT GOOD FOR EVERYONE, CONTACT ADMIN AT ilovescratch@foxmail.com
Skip to content

Conversation

@yihanzhen
Copy link
Contributor

@yihanzhen yihanzhen commented Sep 19, 2023

It is misleading to annotate book_id with REQUIRED in the example because in many cases, clients can/must omit the resource id and let the server pick one.

@yihanzhen yihanzhen requested a review from a team as a code owner September 19, 2023 23:29
@yihanzhen yihanzhen changed the title fix: remove REQUIRED from the resource_id field. fix (AIP-133): remove REQUIRED from the resource_id field. Sep 19, 2023
@yihanzhen yihanzhen changed the title fix (AIP-133): remove REQUIRED from the resource_id field. fix(AIP-133): remove REQUIRED from the resource_id field. Sep 19, 2023
@noahdietz
Copy link
Collaborator

@yihanzhen can you add a bit of description with the rationale please? Thanks!

@yihanzhen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants