WARNING: THIS SITE IS A MIRROR OF GITHUB.COM / IT CANNOT LOGIN OR REGISTER ACCOUNTS / THE CONTENTS ARE PROVIDED AS-IS / THIS SITE ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DISPLAYED CONTENT OR LINKS / IF YOU FOUND SOMETHING MAY NOT GOOD FOR EVERYONE, CONTACT ADMIN AT ilovescratch@foxmail.com
Skip to content

fix: Making cleaner rollback parallelism configurable with metadata table #17724

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
nsivabalan wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix: Making cleaner rollback parallelism configurable with metadata table #17724

nsivabalan wants to merge 2 commits into from
+107 −10

Conversation

@nsivabalan
Copy link
Contributor

@nsivabalan nsivabalan commented Dec 26, 2025

Describe the issue this Pull Request addresses

Summary and Changelog

  • Making cleaner rollback parallelism configurable with metadata table

Impact

  • For large scale tables, this will come in handy.

Risk Level

low

Documentation Update

Contributor's checklist

  • Read through contributor's guide
  • Enough context is provided in the sections above
  • Adequate tests were added if applicable

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size:M PR with lines of changes in (100, 300] label Dec 26, 2025
@hudi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hudi-bot commented Dec 27, 2025

CI report:

Bot commands @hudi-bot supports the following commands:
  • @hudi-bot run azure re-run the last Azure build

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

size:M PR with lines of changes in (100, 300]

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@nsivabalan @hudi-bot