WARNING: THIS SITE IS A MIRROR OF GITHUB.COM / IT CANNOT LOGIN OR REGISTER ACCOUNTS / THE CONTENTS ARE PROVIDED AS-IS / THIS SITE ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DISPLAYED CONTENT OR LINKS / IF YOU FOUND SOMETHING MAY NOT GOOD FOR EVERYONE, CONTACT ADMIN AT ilovescratch@foxmail.com
Skip to content

Conversation

@mborland
Copy link
Member

@mborland mborland commented Feb 6, 2025

Instead of putting the encryption modes into one giant class like last time we are going to separate them out responsibly.

Closes: #244

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.94%. Comparing base (f17fe1d) to head (d6a2ef2).
Report is 18 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #254    +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage    99.94%   99.94%            
=========================================
  Files           96       98     +2     
  Lines         3711     3926   +215     
=========================================
+ Hits          3709     3924   +215     
  Misses           2        2            

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mborland mborland merged commit 6a4d72c into develop Feb 7, 2025
47 checks passed
@mborland mborland deleted the aes_base branch February 7, 2025 01:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update AES base class

2 participants