WARNING: THIS SITE IS A MIRROR OF GITHUB.COM / IT CANNOT LOGIN OR REGISTER ACCOUNTS / THE CONTENTS ARE PROVIDED AS-IS / THIS SITE ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DISPLAYED CONTENT OR LINKS / IF YOU FOUND SOMETHING MAY NOT GOOD FOR EVERYONE, CONTACT ADMIN AT ilovescratch@foxmail.com
Skip to content

Conversation

@sunsided
Copy link

@sunsided sunsided commented Jun 24, 2023

This adds support for RFC1864: The Content-MD5 Header Field.

I understand that Content-MD5 is not an HTTP/1.1 header and therefore doesn't necessarily fit in with the http and headers crates aiming at RFC7230 (only). Is such a contribution wished for anyway?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant