WARNING: THIS SITE IS A MIRROR OF GITHUB.COM / IT CANNOT LOGIN OR REGISTER ACCOUNTS / THE CONTENTS ARE PROVIDED AS-IS / THIS SITE ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DISPLAYED CONTENT OR LINKS / IF YOU FOUND SOMETHING MAY NOT GOOD FOR EVERYONE, CONTACT ADMIN AT ilovescratch@foxmail.com
Skip to content

Conversation

@aufi
Copy link
Member

@aufi aufi commented Aug 8, 2025

Small update on shared test README replacing tc.yaml with test_cases.yml file.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Simplified the shared test case documentation by removing the detailed YAML example and providing a direct link to the example file for reference.

Small update on shared test README replacing tc.yaml with test_cases.yml file.

Signed-off-by: Marek Aufart <[email protected]>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The documentation in shared_tests/README.md was updated to remove an inline YAML example describing the test case format. Instead, the README now directly references the test_cases.yml file for details, streamlining the explanation of shared test case structure.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Documentation simplification
shared_tests/README.md
Removed detailed inline YAML example of test cases and replaced it with a link to test_cases.yml.

Sequence Diagram(s)

(Omitted: Documentation-only change with no control flow impact.)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A nibble here, a trim so neat,
The README sheds its bulky sheet.
Now just a link, concise and clear,
Points the way—no clutter here!
With every hop, docs lighter grow,
This rabbit cheers the streamlined flow! 🐇✨

Note

🔌 MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available in Early Access!

Pro users can now connect to remote MCP servers under the Integrations page to get reviews and chat conversations that understand additional development context.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch shared-tests-readme

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
shared_tests/README.md (2)

3-3: Fix minor typos and grammar.

Two small wording fixes to improve clarity.

-Konveyor project affers multiple way of application analysis. There is a shared set of end-to-end basic application analyses that is tested with all relevant components (as an addition to their tests) and this is considered as a source of truth for analysis results.
+The Konveyor project offers multiple ways of application analysis. There is a shared set of basic end-to-end application analyses that is tested with all relevant components (in addition to their tests) and is considered the source of truth for analysis results.
-More information about shared tests in CI generaly: https://github.com/konveyor/enhancements/pull/228
+More information about shared tests in CI generally: https://github.com/konveyor/enhancements/pull/228

Also applies to: 29-29


7-7: Nit: add spacing around “&” for readability.

-- CLI - kantra tests (container&containerless including Windows) https://github.com/konveyor-ecosystem/kantra-cli-tests/
+- CLI - kantra tests (container & containerless including Windows) https://github.com/konveyor-ecosystem/kantra-cli-tests/
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 364fa2a and c998d39.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • shared_tests/README.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Verify api and ui tests run via global-ci-bundle.yml with default input / e2e-ui-integration-tests
  • GitHub Check: Verify api and ui tests run via global-ci-bundle.yml with default input / e2e-api-integration-tests
  • GitHub Check: Verify api and ui tests run via global-ci.yml with default inputs / e2e-ui-integration-tests
  • GitHub Check: Verify api and ui tests run via global-ci.yml with default inputs / e2e-api-integration-tests

├── book-server_deps # name of the test case
| ├── dependencies.yaml # analyzer-like dependencies output (produced in full analysis mode)
| └── output.yaml # analyzer-like analysis output (contain ruleset with violations/issues reported and optionally Tags on technology usage and discovery)
└── test_cases.yaml # analysis test cases definition (top level keys should match to directory names with expected results)
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Aug 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix extension mismatch: use test_cases.yml consistently.

The tree lists test_cases.yaml, but the link and PR objective point to test_cases.yml. Standardize on .yml to match the PR intent and avoid confusion.

Apply this diff:

-    └── test_cases.yaml          # analysis test cases definition (top level keys should match to directory names with expected results)
+    └── test_cases.yml           # analysis test cases definition (top level keys should match directory names with expected results)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
└── test_cases.yaml # analysis test cases definition (top level keys should match to directory names with expected results)
└── test_cases.yml # analysis test cases definition (top level keys should match directory names with expected results)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In shared_tests/README.md at line 17, the filename extension for the test cases
file is listed as .yaml, but the rest of the PR and links use .yml. Change the
filename in the tree listing from test_cases.yaml to test_cases.yml to maintain
consistency and avoid confusion.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mguetta1 Thank you for confirming! The extension standardization will help maintain consistency in the documentation.

ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ


If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?

Thank you for using CodeRabbit!

```

Check out [book-server test case](analysis_book-server/) as an example.
Check out [test cases.yml](test_cases.yml)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Align link text with actual filename and clarify.

Use the exact filename in the link text for clarity and consistency with the tree.

Apply this diff:

-Check out [test cases.yml](test_cases.yml)
+See [test_cases.yml](test_cases.yml) for the canonical test case definition.

Run this script to verify there are no stale references and confirm which file exists:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo "Searching for stale references to tc.yaml..."
rg -n --hidden --glob '!.git' 'tc\.ya?ml' || true

echo -e "\nListing test_cases files present in the repo..."
fd -a 'test_cases.y*ml' || true

echo -e "\nScanning for references to test_cases.yml/.yaml in the repo..."
rg -n --hidden --glob '!.git' 'test_cases\.ya?ml' || true

Length of output: 1559


Align README references to the actual filename and clarify.

  • In shared_tests/README.md line 17, the tree listing shows test_cases.yaml but the file on disk is test_cases.yml. Update it for consistency:

-└── test_cases.yaml # analysis test cases definition …
+└── test_cases.yml # analysis test cases definition …

- In the same file at line 20, use the exact filename in the link text and clarify its purpose:
```diff
-Check out [test cases.yml](test_cases.yml)
+See [test_cases.yml](test_cases.yml) for the canonical test case definition.

Run the provided validation script to ensure there are no stale tc.yaml references and that all test_cases.yml links resolve correctly.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
Check out [test cases.yml](test_cases.yml)
└── test_cases.yml # analysis test cases definition …
See [test_cases.yml](test_cases.yml) for the canonical test case definition.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In shared_tests/README.md at line 20, update the link text from "test cases.yml"
to "test_cases.yml" to match the actual filename exactly and clarify its
purpose, ensuring consistency with the file on disk and the earlier tree
listing. Adjust the link text to be precise and descriptive about the file it
references.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants