WARNING: THIS SITE IS A MIRROR OF GITHUB.COM / IT CANNOT LOGIN OR REGISTER ACCOUNTS / THE CONTENTS ARE PROVIDED AS-IS / THIS SITE ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DISPLAYED CONTENT OR LINKS / IF YOU FOUND SOMETHING MAY NOT GOOD FOR EVERYONE, CONTACT ADMIN AT ilovescratch@foxmail.com
Skip to content

Conversation

@wisotzky
Copy link

target is to fix:
openconfig/gnmi#227

@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Oct 13, 2025

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

<date month="January" year="2018" />
</front>
</reference>
<reference anchor="GNMI-CONFIG-SUBS" target="https://github.com/openconfig/reference/blob/master/rpc/gnmi/gnmi-config-subscriptions.md">
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This .xml source for the long expired draft should not be touched unless there is intention to bring this back through the IETF (which I believe is highly unlikely nor of interest at this point) - essentially these old references can stay untouched for historical reasons is all imo.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hej Ebben (@earies),

My main concern is that the documentation hosted on openconfig.net feels quite incomplete. While the Markdown files for gNMI extensions exist in the GitHub repository, they don’t seem to be used when rendering the website.

My assumption was that the XML document serves as an index of relevant files—similar to how mkdocs.yml works—and that it’s used in the CI flow to publish the site. But perhaps I missed something.

I’d be happy to help improve the publishing setup and ensure the docs are properly surfaced on the webpage. Pointing people directly to subfolders in the GitHub repo doesn’t feel like the right long-term solution.

/wiso

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed - outside of the specification .md, I think doc reordering, a proper index and cleanup is necessary.... YMMV with the other docs atm.

This .xml is just the source to generate a draft for submission through the IETF so it's historical and not for the intentions you suggest. Worth keeping around but not to be edited.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants